JUBILEE OF GLASGOW TRAMWAYS.
REMARKABLE PROGRESS OF A GREAT UNDERTAKING.
(The Tramway and Railway World 1922)
The jubilee of the Glasgow tramways, which were
inaugurated on August 19, 1872, was celebrated in the city on
August 18. For twenty-three years the service was provided by
a private company, who leased the track from the Corporation,
but in 1894 the undertaking was municipalised. Four years later
electric traction was introduced, and in 1900 the horse car system
was completely superseded. Under municipal management the service
was rapidly extended. To-day the range of the system is
over 100 miles of double track, and acquisitions and developments
which are being carried out at the present time will add almost
a further fifty miles. The efficiency with which the undertaking
has been operated has earned for it a world-wide prestige, and
reference is often made to it as a model of municipal tramway
enterprise. The jubilee celebrations included the distribution
of £1 each to all the employees in the service of the department,
the reproduction of the opening ceremony of fifty years ago with
a parade of a horse drawn car of primitive type, and the holding
of a civic luncheon and an evening reception in the City Chambers.
The Lord Provost of the City (Mr. Thomas Paxton)
presided at the luncheon, and the guests included representatives
of various tramway undertakings throughout the country. The occasion
brought together an interesting group of managers of transport
enterprises who were at one time or another associated with the
direction of the Glasgow service. These included Mr. J. Barber
Glenn, who was the first secretary of the Glasgow Tramway and
Omnibus Company the
private concern which established the undertaking; Mr. John Young,
under whose regime as general manager the service was municipalised,
and who afterwards received an appointment in the administration
of the London Underground Railways; Mr. J. B. Hamilton, who is
now manager of the Leeds tramways; Mr. William Clark, at one
time engineer to the Glasgow department, who was appointed manager
of the Lisbon tramways; and Mr, M'Call, now general manager of
the Shanghai tramways. Three of the group served under Mr. James
Dalrymple, the present manager of the Glasgow tramways, who has
been in charge since 1904.

Glasgow Tramway and Omnibus Company Horse Tram
PARLIAMENT AND MUNICIPALITIES.
After the loyal toasts had been submitted by the Lord Provost,
Sir Samuel Chisholm, Bart., proposed " The Houses of Parliament." He
said that while Parliamentary control over local authorities
was no doubt necessary in order to prevent chaos, there was a
good deal to be said for greater freedom of action being allowed
to such municipalities as that of Glasgow. Members of a city
corporation had a closer and clearer vision of the needs of their
own little kingdom and a firmer grasp of the best measures to
adopt to meet the local requirements than could possibly be possessed
by legislators who lived a large portion of their lives in London,
detached by their circumstances from intimate sympathy with the
local community. It would be absurd to ask that Parliament should
grant everything that municipalities desired, but this much at
least he thought should be recognised—that when municipalities,
after careful consideration, brought proposals before the Houses
of Parliament, these proposals should receive a favourable and
friendly reception, and should not be dismissed simply because
they were without any precedent. (Applause.)

First Car run by Glasgow Corporation, 4.53 am, 1st July 1894
Lord Belhaven and Stenton, in the course of his reply, said
that the progress of the Glasgow tramways could be reviewed with
genuine satisfaction. The success of the undertaking was undeniable,
both in the matter of providing a cheap and excellent service
for the community and as a remunerative enterprise that was
now known far and wide and thoroughly deserved the great reputation
it had acquired. Glasgow had been and still was a pioneer in
the development of municipal tramways, and other Corporations
were paying it the compliment still of copying its methods. The
extension of the tramways had materially improved the social
conditions of the city. It was a well-known circumstance that
where the tramways came in slums receded and their places were
taken by smart residential and business quarters. In paying a
tribute to the wonderful efficiency of the service, Lord Belhaven
declared that everyone who travelled by the Glasgow cars must
be more or less impressed with the invariable good nature and
courtesy displayed by the employees. A more obliging and civil
body of public servants could not be met anywhere he believed
in the world. (Applause.)
Mr. A. M'Callum Scott, M.P., and Mr. F. A. Macquisten, M.P.,
also replied to the toast.
Alderman Clark (Rochdale) proposed " The Corporation of
Glasgow," and in referring to the tramway system of the
city he said the success of the tramways had done a great deal
to add to the prestige of the city. The system carried with it
great benefits to the citizens. He had been greatly impressed
with the ceremony that day, and he thought no one could have
witnessed it without being struck with the great difference there
was in transport to-day compared with the earlier days of the
system. Glasgow had been most fortunate in all the circumstances
connected with their tramways, and particularly fortunate
with regard to their tramway managers. (Applause.) The system
would not have been what it was to-day had it not been placed
under capable managership.

Glasgow Corporation Tram Car 1922
A RETROSPECT.
The Lord Provost, in response, said "I esteem
it a great honour to preside on this historic occasion, marking
as it does a notable milestone in the journey towards municipalisation
of one of the most important and successful of the undertakings
of the Corporation. The fifty years history of the tramway
undertaking furnishes an unexampled spectacle of continuous,
prudent, and far-sighted management which I think has no parallel
in any similar undertaking or in any country. Glasgow has been
pointed to as a model for other cities in municipal activity,
but in none has its claims to recognition as a pioneer found
more ample justification than in the tramway undertaking. The
inception and development of the undertaking for the last 50
years reads almost like a fairy tale; As someone said on the
occasion of the celebration of the jubilee of our water supply
in 1909, " We are paying tribute to-day to that which is
the greatest of all qualities which go to the making of a State
the dynamic quality of imagination in civic life. Without
it progress is impossible in any direction worthy to be desired.
Without imagination the mind of the city, as of the individual,
is fettered to stagnation and infertility." Those who have
had the control of our tramways undertaking have in a pre-eminent
degree shown that supreme quality of imagination as the history
of the undertaking undoubtedly demonstrates. I need refer only
very briefly to the successive stages of our tramways to prove
the truth of that statement. It was on August 19, 1872 fifty
years ago that the first tramway was opened in Glasgow.
The lines were leased to the Glasgow Tramway and Omnibus Company,
and I am glad to learn that we have at our gathering to-day more
than one of the gentlemen who were identified with it. The first
route to be opened was from St. George's Road to Eglinton Toll
a distance of 2 1/4 miles and by the end of 1872 four other
lines were opened I would like at this point to pay a tribute
to the manner in which the old tramway company discharged their
duty for 23 years both to the Corporation and to the citizens,
and it was through no fault of theirs, nor was it because of
any lack of efficiency or administration that the Corporation
in 1891 resolved to take over the control of the tramways into
their own hands. The company's lease expired on June 30, 1894,
and on the following day, over 28 years ago, the Corporation
started to operate the tramways. Nobody but those who were in
the Town Council at that date can realise the stupendous task
which confronted the Corporation at this time. Owing to the negotiations
for the acquisition of the plant and equipment of the old company
falling through, the duty devolved upon the municipality to organise
the whole service for themselves before the company's lease terminated
on June 30. They had only about eighteen months to prepare, and
in that short time so complete was the organisation in the
able hands of the Corporation's first manager, Mr. John Young,
whom I am delighted to see here with us to-day, that on July
1, 1894, a complete service of cars was placed on the streets,
and the citizens were thus not inconvenienced by a single
hour owing to the transference of control. The history of the
tramways department ever since then has been one long record
of success, and the fact that to-day the tramways undertaking
stands pre-eminent among similar undertakings, and has shaped
the municipal policy in connection with tramways not only in
this country but throughout Europe, is due to the zeal, enterprise,
and enthusiasm with which successive tramway committees
and general managers have applied themselves to meeting not only
the increasing travelling requirements of the citizens at the
minimum charge, but to equipping and developing the system as
a whole, and adapting it to the growing requirements of a growing
population. The great strides which the department has made may
be shown by quoting a few eloquent figures. In 1894, when the
Corporation took over the tramways, there were only 32 miles
of route. To-day there are 100 miles, and within recent weeks
the Corporation, by the resolution to acquire the Airdrie and
Coatbridge system and the Paisley tramway system, will add 21
miles, and if we include the subway, which was recently acquired,
it will bring the total of mileage up to 146. Then with regard
to passengers carried, it is almost unbelievable that while those
numbered for the year 1893-94 fifty-four millions, they now number
five hundred and nine millions. Revenue in 1894-95 stood at £226,414,
compared with £2,354,294 for last year. It was no
small thing from a financial point of view for the municipality
to assume the control of such a gigantic undertaking, but it
speaks volumes for the manner in which it was managed that in
1917 that is to say within 23 years the whole indebtedness
of the undertaking was cleared off, and to-day the magnitude
of the tramway undertaking might be summed up in the statement
that during the last 28 years in which the municipality has provided
the tramway facilities the grand aggregate of the passenger traffic
has advanced to the colossal figure of over seven billions, while
the revenue has approached twenty-seven million pounds, or an
average of almost a million a year. I need say no more, but would
conclude by congratulating all concerned, and it will not be
invidious if I specially pay a tribute to the management,
first of Mr. John Young, the original manager, and secondly to
Mr. James Dalrymple, our present manager. The city of Glasgow
has always been fortunate in its officials, but in none more
than in those of the tramway department, and I consider it a
very happy circumstance for me that this important celebration
should take place during my term of office.

John Young
General Manager, Glasgow Corporation Tramways, 1894 - 1904
Councillor Mancor, convener of Edinburgh Tramways
Committee
of that city, proposed the toast of " The Tramways Committee
of Glasgow." The efficiency of the Glasgow system, he said,
was an incentive to all those who would learn by example. The
Corporation of Edinburgh meant to emulate so far as it lay
in their power the policy of the Glasgow Tramway Committee. When
important guests were entertained in the city of Edinburgh they
generally spoke of it as having a glorious history a fascinating
past. But his view was that no city could live on its traditions
alone, and it was clear to him that in the past Glasgow Corporation
had never lent ear to such nonsense. From the press he understood
that there was a certain section in Glasgow who thought the Tramways
Committee should perform miracles financially that they
should immediately revert to the halfpenny fare. To the press
who urged that he thought they might reply that the public would
get back to the halfpenny fares the same day as they got back
to the halfpenny papers. The governing factors were the same
in both cases.
Bailie M'Whirr, convener of Glasgow Tramways
Committee, in replying, said that the Tramways Committee had
always been fortunate in having a splendid staff of workers.
During the past two years the committee had had to consider some
questions of very great and far-reaching importance. They had
been called upon, for example, to decide as to the purchase of
the Paisley tramways, the Airdrie and Coatbridge tramways, and
of the Glasgow Subway Railway. Last year the committee had organised
a great amount of relief work for the benefit of the unemployed,
and only the other day they had agreed to a further scheme which
would give employment to about 1,700 men for twelve months. After
referring to the necessity for the withdrawal of the halfpenny
fare in 1920, Bailie M'Whirr said he was sorry to say that a
movement was now on foot to reinstate the fare on a slightly
different basis. The proposal had been turned down at the meeting
of the Tramways Committee by a small majority, and he hoped that
when the question came before the Corporation they would support
the majority of the Committee. The tramways had always been run
on safe business lines, and they felt that it would endanger
the financial position of the undertaking if they tampered with
the fares at the present time. Dealing with the question of congestion
of traffic, he said that the most effective remedy was unquestionably
that of the construction of more bridges across the Clyde. The
Corporation had already agreed that a bridge should be built
at Oswald Street, but he was of opinion that another bridge was
also required. With two bridges he believed that the traffic
could be so spread as to remove the existing congestion.

James Dalryple CBE
General Manager, Glasgow Corporation Tramways, 1904 -
Sir W. F. Russell proposed " The Staff,
Past and Present." The
Glasgow Tramways, he said, since they had become the property
of the Corporation, had been very fortunate in their managers,
officers, and staff. In fact, the management and financial success
had been the envy of all tramway undertakings not only in this
country but abroad. No doubt the credit of all this was due to
the efficiency and ability of the managers who from time to time
had been at the head of the undertaking. They had with them that
day the following past members of the staff Mr. Barber
Glenn, the first secretary of the tramway company in 1872; Mr.
John Young, general manager; Mr. J. B. Hamilton, now of Leeds;
Mr. William Clark, engineer, who was appointed to the Lisbon
tramways, and had now retired ; and Mr. M'Call, now general manager
of the Shanghai Tramways. Mr. Young, after a successful period
of management, had resigned to take up an important appointment
in the underground railways in London. Mr. Hamilton had
distinguished himself in many ways in Leeds as manager of the
tramways there and other offices. As regards the present staff,
following Mr. Young, Mr. Dalrymple was appointed general manager, and during his successful management the tramway
mileage had been increased until it was practically 100 miles
of double track. It was his privilege to have been a member of
the Tramways Committee for twelve years, during which he was
sub-convener for three years, and convener for three years under
Mr. Dalrymple's management. During that period he had had ample
opportunity of forming an opinion of the abilities of Mr. Dalrymple.
The least he could say about him was that he could not name any
Corporation or commercial undertaking that was more efficiently
conducted and managed. (Applause.) Mr. Dalrymple seemed to have
the knack of having under him officers of experience and training,
in many cases trained under himself. Mr. Dalrymple was greatly
assisted by Mr. M'Kinnon, assistant manager, and the general
staff, including a head office staff of 322. There was a total
staff of 8,746 men and women, and 62 per cent, of the total revenue
was paid in wages. Last year 27 millions of miles were run, and
431 millions of passengers carried. That all this was accomplished
with very few accidents reflected the greatest possible credit
on the management and the whole staff. (Applause.)
Mr. Barber Glenn briefly expressed his thanks for the compliment
paid to him.
Mr. John Young said—I ask you to accept my warmest thanks
for the very kind and flattering terms in which Sir William Russell
has proposed the toast of the staff, past and present, and for
the generous way in which the distinguished company has received
it. I am glad to be associated in the toast with the original
secretary of the Glasgow Tramways and Omnibus Company, Mr. Barber
Glenn, and heartily join in congratulating him on being in harness
at 83, and as you can both see and hear, I am no longer young
except in name. (Laughter.) It was in 1875, three years after
the first tramways were opened, that I entered the Corporation
service at 30, and for practically the next thirty years was
one of the departmental chiefs. It is now eighteen years since
I went to London, and it is wonderful how, even in that short
time, one can feel so much a stranger. I suppose one could count
on the fingers of one hand the present members of the Corporation
who were members of the Corporation eighteen years ago, but I
am pleased still to recognise many well-known and friendly faces.
It is a real pleasure to me except for the speechmaking
to have the privilege of being once again present at a representative
Glasgow gathering, more especially that the occasion is the celebration
of the jubilee of the Glasgow tramways, with which my name happens
to be closely identified. I can say in all sincerity that I have
the pleasantest recollections of my thirty years' experience
in Glasgow. From first to last I had the happiest relations with
the ever changing members of the Corporation and committees by
reason of the goodwill and trust which always prevailed. As to
the tramways, I am sure on this jubilee day you will excuse my
saying frankly that I am naturally pleased to have had a fashioning
hand in the creation and organisation and administration of the
Glasgow Corporation Tramways Department, which in a very few
years came to be referred to, the world over, as a record success
in municipal enterprise. With regard to the municipal staff,
past and present, I can truly say that the original staff the
selection of which was one of my responsibilities was such
that one could scarcely wish a better. And happily the present
staff has so naturally evolved from the past, by a gradual succession
within itself, as to remain practically the same thing continued.
Many have been called away to occupy chief positions at home
and abroad. They are represented here by Mr. Clark, Mr. Hamilton,
Mr. McColl, and Mr. Goslin. But others have
always been ready to step forward, and we have to-day Mr. Dalrymple
as chief, Mr. McKinnon as second in command, Mr. Ferguson, Mr.
Wilson, Mr. Braid, and others of the old days, worthily upholding
the standard. This is surely as it ought to be. I wish godspeed
to all who have been and arc connected with the undertaking.

EARLY DAYS OF MUNICIPAL WORKING. Perhaps, my
Lord Provost, enough has already been said and heard for one
day on the Glasgow tramways, but a jubilee is not an ordinary
day, and on this historic occasion you may still be willing to
hear shortly from me, even at the risk of repetition I shall
not trouble you with figures a
few episodes in the beginning and earlier years in the history
of the tramways as a municipal undertaking. Carlyle says
that " In any phenomenon the beginning always remains the
most notable moment." You have heard that in 1891-92 the
Corporation and the lessees failed in the negotiations for a
renewal of the lease, and the Corporation thereafter, with public
approval, resolved to exercise their already existing powers
by taking the operation of their tramways into their own hands
the first Corporation to take that step, destined as it was to
shape and influence municipal tramways policy everywhere. You
also know that an offer was made to take over, at the end of
the lease, the entire tramways establishment of the lessees as
it stood, at valuation as a going concern, and that the lessees
declined it, declaring their intention of running opposition
omnibuses. It was at this juncture that I was called in by the
Tramways Committee to advise, and the whole position and policy
were fully gone into. The outcome was that I became general manager
of the new department, and with the necessary authority
accepted, under the committee, the responsibility of planning,
creating and organising an entirely new establishment, and of
being ready to turn out the new municipal service on July 1, 1894
some eighteen months ahead.
About a dozen sites were purchased, on which were erected, to
plans prepared in the departmental office, stables for 5,000
horses, car sheds for 500 cars, a large granary and forage store,
and an extensive car repairing works and factory, with all appurtenances
and machinery. The design of the new cars was likewise prepared
and approved, and orders were placed for 400 to begin with. Within
three or four months of the starting day about 4,000 horses were
purchased, mostly from overseas. There were then the staff and
whole personnel, some 4,000 in number, to engage and have in
readiness for the appointed day. Obviously this was a very different
proposition from simply taking over an undertaking as a going
concern. But " all's well that ends well," and it
proved to have been for the best.
The 1st July was a Sunday. Fortunately it was
a day of perfect sunshine, quite a red letter day in the city.
Punctually the new municipal service appeared all over the city,
under improved working conditions and revised routes and fares,
including the new halfpenny fare. The service was operated to
schedule time and without a hitch. Success was secure from the
very beginning. The competing omnibuses soon disappeared,
and other Corporations who were interested onlookers hastened
to follow Glasgow's example. So much for the first stage the
genesis of tramways municipalisation.
We were, of course, fully alive to the limits of horse traction.
Mechanical traction was in the air, but the time for a public
decision was not yet ripe. Overhead electric traction had already
been introduced and was beginning to find favour abroad. Personally
I was much taken with it. As a matter of fact, in 1893, we had
the Maryhill and Springburn routes tentatively surveyed and estimated
for, but, placed as we were, we found it impracticable to move
in that direction at the start. For one thing no preparation
for a change of traction could be made while the tracks were
in the hands of the lessees. And we certainly gained by waiting.
The cable system had for some time been in operation here and
there abroad, but it did not make much progress. As far back
as 1885, when in San Francisco on a short visit, I was shown
over the cable system of that city, but I considered it cumbrous
and inflexible. This, and many other systems, in being and embryo,
were strongly advocated, and all were carefully examined
on their merits.

ADOPTION OF ELECTRIC TRACTION.
Meantime electric traction was making steady progress abroad.
On the first official tour of inspection on the Continent with
the late Bailie Crawford, we saw it well installed and in full
operation, and were so much pleased that we had no hesitation
in recommending its adoption. The question being of so great
public importance, the chairman and deputy chairman, Bailie Paton
and Bailie Wallace, and several members of the committee, were
deputed to make further investigations on the Continent, and
I remember we had with us on that occasion your present highly
esteemed member Bailie Burt. They were likewise favourably impressed
with the system, and reported accordingly. Finally, so as to
leave no doubt on the question, I was sent over with the chief
engineering assistant, Mr. Clark, to America, to examine further
and report. We found there that the overhead electric system
was undoubtedly and speedily making headway, and we saw cable
lines being pulled out to be replaced by it, so that we could
do no other than confirm previous reports in its favour.
Thereafter, in 1897, its adoption was resolved upon by the committee
and the Corporation, and as a demonstration it was first of all
installed by our own staff on the Springburn route, in 1898.
This proved so satisfactory that within a few months the Corporation
passed a resolution to have the whole system similarly converted,
and expressed the hope that the electric cars would be in operation
at the opening of the International Exhibition at Kelvingrove
in May 1901. The change involved a great upheaval. It meant the
taking up and relaying with heavier 60 feet rails of practically
the whole track, with the horse cars running all the time; the
laying down of ducts all along the routes for the distributing
cables; the setting up of a vast electric system, including a
large power-station and sub-stations, and the electrical equipment
of all the lines, rolling stock and depots; and the building
and equipping of the larger cars in our own factories for which
we afterwards designed the unobtrusive top covers.
In view of this second application of the time
limit, plans and specifications were promptly prepared, and again
operations were simultaneously pushed forward at all points much
of it with our own staff and on the site purchased on the
Canal at Pinkston the power-station was brought into being fully
equipped to the plans of Dr. Parshall. The only hitch in the
whole operations occurred through the brickwork contractors throwing
up their Pinkston contract when they had little more than the
foundations laid. The only way out of the impasse in time was
for us to secure the materials and employ direct labour to carry
on and complete the buildings. This was done. The result of it
all was that on the opening day of the exhibition the electric
cars were in operation according to plan. They got a most hearty
reception, and again I was truly thankful. The success which
followed, as is well known, was unprecedented. Fares, always
the lowest on record, were further reduced. The service was speedily
increased and extended, and the revenue kept mounting by leaps
and bounds. Electricity had opened a new era with boundless possibilities
for the future of the tramways. Glasgow's example in this
second pioneering departure was again closely followed by other
Corporations, and very soon the system was practically universal.
This was the second stage the exodus from the bondage and
limitations of horse traction.

STRONG BUSINESS POSITION OF THE TRAMWAYS.
And now a few words on finance. With financial
success assured at the beginning of 1894, and in the confident
anticipation of mechanical traction, substantial depreciation
and renewal funds, in addition to the statutory sinking fund,
were established. The result was—and this is apt to be
forgotten—that
at the end of seven years of successful horse traction the accumulated
reserves practically covered the cost of converting the lines
for electric traction, and the- continuance of the same reserve
and sinking funds, as you all know, resulted at the end of the
first sixteen years of ever increasing prosperity under electric
traction in placing my good friend and successor, Mr. Dalrymple,
in the happy position of being able to announce an accumulation
sufficient to wipe off the whole capital of close upon £4,000,000.
I have only a few words more to say on the long view. Even with
horse traction the view taken by the Corporation was that while
the city proper was their first and chief charge, it was sound
business to extend the benefits of the Glasgow tramways to the
surrounding
communities. From that time powers to this end were obtained
with the good will and co-operation of the neighbouring authorities.
But the advent of electric traction disclosed a greatly wider
sphere. The results and potentialities it brought were such that
one could scarcely escape the conviction that it had now become
the reasonable function of Glasgow tramways, in the broad interests
of the larger community, and on fair terms, to make the system
available to a greater extent for linking up the surrounding
populous places in the Clyde area with the city which forms the
chief centre of attraction and influence. The Corporation of
Glasgow as usual took the long view. In the next few years, and
with general approval, negotiations had been carried through,
and powers obtained for extensions to Renfrew, Paisley, Giffnock,
Rouken Glen, Cambuslang, Uddingston, Bishopbriggs, Dalmuir,
and other places, in addition to needful extensions within the
city. Construction followed closely, so that I had the satisfaction
of seeing the new programme well on its way to fulfilment. And
we know that to this day the larger policy has never been lost
sight of. I now take the liberty of warmly congratulating the
Corporation, the Tramways Committee, and my good and capable
friend and erstwhile coadjutor, Mr. Dalrymple, upon their conspicuous
success throughout all the later years in the splendid development,
up-to-date improvements, and wise extensions of Glasgow's great
system of street and road transport. I expect the next news we
shall have will be the placing of the contract for the relief
bridge over the river. Wonderful progress has indeed been made,
and is being made, by the still youthful Glasgow tramways. This
progress must continue so long as Glasgow flourishes. By all
means let Glasgow and her tramways flourish together.

Mr. James Dalrymple, general manager, Glasgow Corporation Tramways,
speaking in reply for the present staff, said they were proud
to be privileged to participate in the proceedings of that day.
He trusted that the tramways staff would always remember that
they were the servants of the citizens of a noble city, and that
if they did their work faithfully they would have the respect
and confidence and goodwill of the large and growing community
whom they served. On that occasion they looked back and took
stock of the work they had done, but at the same time they also
looked forward with confidence to the days that were to come.
They were satisfied that the work which lay before them would
be far more interesting and far greater than anything they had
yet tackled. (Applause.)
On the motion of Sir John Ure Primrose, a vote of thanks was
accorded to the Lord Provost for presiding.
About 1,500 guests took part in the reception which was held
in the City Chambers in the evening. They were received by Lord
Provost Paxton and Mrs. Paxton. Dancing was engaged in, and a
programme of music was also submitted.